United Healthcare/Brian Thompson/Luigi Mangione/NSA etc.

United Healthcare is the 4th largest company in the US and is the largest healthcare company in the US.

The NSA has been passively watching Americans (and everyone else if they can or want to) for a very long time through various programs involving companies like Google etc.(not that Google participated, they were hacked by the NSA, according to Edward Snowden's releases but other companies like AT&T did cooperate with the NSA according to the Snowden releases) and this was disclosed by whistleblower Edward Snowden, former NSA intelligence contractor, famously in the 2010's.

This is old news.

Any high priority person such as the CEO of UnitedHealthcare would be at the very least passively monitored as it costs next to nothing to have these computer based surveillance systems listen to their phones.

(Which seems likely because everyone has a phone and the Snowden leaks detailed that telecommunication and internet providers like AT&T and Verizon worked with the US federal government for monitoring purposes, so while its not necessarily a person's phone that is being used for monitoring, it seems likely given that its verified that the NSA had previously worked closely with companies like AT&T and had hacked Google) 

So, if anyone is plotting to kill someone like this it's guaranteed that whenever anyone in the US mentions the targets name (in this case the United Healthcare's CEO) and keywords like “kill” or “murder” or something like that, that those people would be immediately flagged as a potential national security threat.

Why is this CEO a national security priority?

For any plethora of reasons but the easily understood ones are that a foreign national terrorist group (or internal terrorist group) could attempt to blackmail the CEO to siphon money from the company on a mass scale or to acquire detailed information about every single customer including addresses etc. so they can carry out whatever terrorist attempt they are doing, or specifically to target agents that work at the FBI or Homeland Security in a form of revenge for these agents thwarting terrorist activities within the US or perhaps even CIA agents for thwarting terrorist activities abroad by getting the home addresses of said agents, their spouses names, their childrens names, their doctors names and address, and likely their pharmacy address etc. and then they can use that information to harm said agents or their families etc. as all of that information and more can can be acquired through insurance records.

Don't you think federal employees have health insurance?

Furthermore, don't you think that there could be any number of other ways that terrorists could use that information?

Does it make sense now why the NSA would be monitoring the CEO of the largest healthcare company in the US?

It would be wildly irresponsible if the American federal government wasn't monitoring the safety of this CEO.

Edward Snowden released information years ago confirming the NSA is monitoring or can monitor average Americans and to naively think the CEO of the largest healthcare company and 4th largest company in the US isn't being monitored by the internal security agencies of the US is so unbelievably laughable it's hard to believe the public is this naive.

The point is, there is no way the US federal government didn't know about this attack.

This young man who murdered this CEO is bright but he didn't outwit the American federal government, they allowed this attack to occur.

Why did they allow this?

It's hard to say, but that isn't the point.

The point is, the NSA was definitely watching and this kid is smart but he didn't outwit the NSA and it's all but guaranteed that they watched him the whole time.

You don't need to believe me, just Google Edward Snowden and there are plenty of articles including from the New York Times etc. that confirm what I am saying is true in regards to surveillance programs that Edward Snowden released information about approximately a decade ago.

The NSA can spy on a grandma making apple pie while her husband is watching baseball on TV in any average American town if they want to and it's impossible not to believe they would have not been surveilling at least passively the CEO of the 4th largest company in the US and the largest healthcare company in the US because the risk of that man getting compromised by either terrorist organizations or America's other enemies such as foreign intelligence agencies from countries like Iran etc. is far too great of a national security risk to not at least passively monitor this CEO and any other powerful American business people and likely anyone globally with similar power.

Think about it, if you were the US federal government wouldn't you consider monitoring this man in case he gets compromised by America's very real enemies?

Furthermore, the media is well aware of the Snowden leaks as the Washington Post and the Guardian etc. were some of the news organizations that published Snowden's releases. 

So with that in mind, why isn't the mainstream media grilling the FBI as to how this CEO got murdered in the first place? As the media knows from the Snowden leaks that even average Americans can and are spied on.

Yet the media has not asked anything about any of this, why not?

On a side note; take a minute and Google how Google Earth was created and you'll find that it has its connections to the CIA.

The company Keyhole Inc. originally developed a piece of software called “Earth Viewer” which was the predecessor of Google Earth and Keyhole Inc. was funded in part by a company called “In-Q-Tel” which is a CIA funded company and Google bought Keyhole Inc. in the early 2000s and developed “Earth Viewer” to eventually become what we now know as Google Earth, those CIA investors came along with Google's purchase of Keyhole Inc.

After the Edward Snowden leaks Google claimed to be outraged that the NSA had hacked their product, meanwhile they have had CIA investors 20 years ago, although that does not prove Google was working with the NSA and perhaps Google didn't know Keyhole Inc. was partially funded by the CIA funded company In-Q-Tel but you can verify this information by using Google's search engine from either news articles it provides to you via a Google search and with the help of Google's AI and sites like Wikipedia, so you the reader can draw your own conclusions and perhaps Google didn't know about Keyhole Inc. and In-Q-Tel at the time. 

On a totally unrelated note in the 1960s the CIA had a security satellite system called “Keyhole” but I'm sure that's just a coincidence. (“Keyhole” was part of the first US satellite program called “Corona”)

You can verify this on the CIAs website:

https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/3d24f7019bf7e718fd1d2a5c57e6a646/corona.pdf

Crazy coincidence about the name “Keyhole” being a 1960s CIA security satellite system and then years later the CIA funds a company called Keyhole Inc. from one of their companies and Keyhole Inc. pioneered a satellite program that would eventually become Google Earth.

I'm sure all of this is completely unrelated.

You don't need to believe me about Keyhole Inc. or Google Earth either, the CIA themselves disclose their involvement Keyhole Inc. and how “Earth Viewer” went on to be Google Earth on their own website:

https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/cia-contributions-to-modern-technology-75-years/

From the CIA website:

“In February 2003, the CIA-funded venture-capital firm In-Q-Tel made a strategic investment in Keyhole, Inc., a pioneer of interactive 3-D earth visualization and creator of the groundbreaking rich-mapping EarthViewer 3D system.”

Also from the CIA website:

“The popularity of this technology eventually caught the attention of Google, which acquired Keyhole in 2004. You know this technology today as Google Earth.”

With that said, don't you think the US  federal government could possibly monitor a national security priority from satellites?

Wouldn't the NSA consider using these satellite resources to monitor a threat to national security like the planned murder of a powerful American business person?

Do any of you still believe this young man outwitted all the US authorities?

Think.